PubMed
Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50
Indirect
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression
Positive
N/A
Carbon source quality/availability
Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
N/A
PubMed
Liu R et al., Metabolic engineering, 2019 Jan;51():50-58Liu R et al., Metabolic engineering, 2019 Jan;51():50-58
Indirect
RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
BY4741
Carbon source quality/availability
6% ethanol
N/A
PubMed
Horkai D et al., PLoS biology, 2023 Aug;21(8):e3002245Horkai D et al., PLoS biology, 2023 Aug;21(8):e3002245
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Positive
MEP
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
YPD,log: Cells were grown in YP + 2% glucose (YPD) at 30°C, 200 rpm and harvested at log phase as a young control.
1.954236
PubMed
van der Horst SC et al., Nature communications, 2025 Feb 6;16(1):1416van der Horst SC et al., Nature communications, 2025 Feb 6;16(1):1416
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Negative
W303
Cell cycle/morphology
60 min: RNA-seq performed in YPAD medium. Overnight cultures were diluted in fresh YPAD and grown for 3 h. Cells were then synchronized in G1 by α-factor treatment for 2 h, washed once in YPAD, and released into YPAD containing 200 mM hydroxyurea (HU). Samples were collected at t=60min: 60 min after release into HU (replication stress condition)
