PubMed
Blaiseau PL et al., The EMBO journal, 1998 Nov 2;17(21):6327-36Blaiseau PL et al., The EMBO journal, 1998 Nov 2;17(21):6327-36
Direct
EMSA
N/A
S288c
N/A
N/A
N/A
PubMed
Su NY et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008 Apr 25;283(17):11615-24Su NY et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008 Apr 25;283(17):11615-24
Indirect
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
BF264-15D
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
wt versus MET32-1 ( tyrosine residue change at position 145 to a termination codon) SC media 25.C
N/A
Indirect
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
BF264-15D
Stress
wt versus MET32-1 ( tyrosine residue change at position 145 to a termination codon) SC media 37.C
N/A
PubMed
Moxley JF et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82Moxley JF et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82
Indirect
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
BY4741
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
YNB media
N/A
PubMed
Carrillo E et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2012 May;23(10):1928-42Carrillo E et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2012 May;23(10):1928-42
Direct
Chip-on-chip
N/A
W303
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
90 min of Met4 induction
N/A
Indirect
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
W303
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
90 min of Met4 induction
N/A
Indirect
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
W303
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
90 min of Met4 induction
N/A
PubMed
Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314