PubMed
Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9
Direct
Chip-on-chip
N/A
S288c
N/A
N/A
PubMed
Chavel CA et al., PLoS genetics, 2010 Mar 19;6(3):e1000883Chavel CA et al., PLoS genetics, 2010 Mar 19;6(3):e1000883
Indirect
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant
Negative
SIGMA1278b
wt vs DELTAswi4: total RNA was isolated from 25 ml cultures grown in YEP GAL for 8h.
N/A
PubMed
Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Negative
15Daub
Yeast strains were grown in rich medium at 30°C to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5.
-0.608587123063584
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Negative
15Daub
Yeast growth media (yeast-peptone-dextrose [YPD], yeast-peptone-acetate, and synthetic complete) were of standard composition
-0.709658191071678
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Negative
15Daub
Cells were grown in 7 ml of SC over-night at 30°C. Cells were synchronized by alpha factor arrest and release and immediately collected. Transcription factor gene deletion.
-0.608587123063584
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Negative
15Daub
Cells were grown in 7 ml of SC over-night at 30°C. Cells were synchronized by alpha factor arrest and release and after 30 minutes they were collected. Transcription factor gene deletion.
-0.709658191071678
PubMed
Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314