PubMed
Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50
Indirect
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression
Negative
N/A
Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
N/A
PubMed
Horkai D et al., PLoS biology, 2023 Aug;21(8):e3002245Horkai D et al., PLoS biology, 2023 Aug;21(8):e3002245
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Positive
MEP
YPD,log: Cells were grown in YP + 2% glucose (YPD) at 30°C, 200 rpm and harvested at log phase as a young control.
0.815477
PubMed
van der Horst SC et al., Nature communications, 2025 Feb 6;16(1):1416van der Horst SC et al., Nature communications, 2025 Feb 6;16(1):1416
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Positive
W303
0 min: RNA-seq performed in YPAD medium. Overnight cultures were diluted in fresh YPAD and grown for 3 h. Cells were then synchronized in G1 by α-factor treatment for 2 h, washed once in YPAD, and released into YPAD containing 200 mM hydroxyurea (HU). Samples were collected at t=0min: immediately after α-factor synchronization (pre-HU release)
0.505065
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Positive
W303
60 min: RNA-seq performed in YPAD medium. Overnight cultures were diluted in fresh YPAD and grown for 3 h. Cells were then synchronized in G1 by α-factor treatment for 2 h, washed once in YPAD, and released into YPAD containing 200 mM hydroxyurea (HU). Samples were collected at t=60min: 60 min after release into HU (replication stress condition)
